Will Lack of Funding Dim the Solar Industry? – TIME

The Fading Era of Big Solar: Will Budget Woes Swamp the Industry?

By Bryan Walsh Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Solar modules at the Southern California Edison solar array in Porterville

Ken James / Bloomberg / Getty ImagesPrint

Big solar producers should be feeling very, er, sunny. New solar power doubled last year globally, with the world adding 16 gigawatts worth of new photovoltaic energy. In the first quarter of 2011, installations of solar power increased 66% over the previous year in the U.S. Just last week the Obama Administration offered a $1.4 billion loan guarantee to help fund what will be the world’s largest rooftop solar project, which put at least 733 megawatts worth of photovoltaic panels on commercial buildings across nearly 30 states while creating 10,000 jobs. Even bad news for the industry is good: a front-page story in Monday’s Washington Post raised questions about why more than half of President Obama’s out-of-town private-business visits had been to renewable-energy companies. Considering that the renewable-energy industry had to fight for any attention from Obama’s hydrocarbon-loving predecessor, being criticized for getting too close to the White House seems like a significant step up.

But there are clouds on the horizon for

But there are clouds on the horizon for solar power — especially for big producers who want to build utility-scale projects, not just slap panels on rooftops. The miniboom in solar in the U.S. is being driven chiefly by U.S. Treasury grants — most funded by the 2009 stimulus — which have helped fill the gap created by the evaporation of private capital after the recession. The only problem is that stimulus funding is just about tapped out, the tax credits are set to expire in December and the mood on Capitol Hill is utterly hostile to more spending. If that government money simply vanishes and private capital fails to appear, the U.S. renewable-energy industry could be set back by years. And no one is at greater risk than those who want to build large-scale solar. (Watch “The Truth About Solar Power.”)

“There’s a big buildup in the industry pipeline right now,” says Arno Harris, the CEO of Recurrent Energy, a utility-scale solar developer. “Financing could fall off a cliff.”

To understand why big solar is at such risk, you have to understand the brave new world of renewable-energy financing. Solar projects and wind farms can be risky — in some cases you’re dealing with new technology, and you’re usually producing electricity at higher prices than your fossil-fuel competitors. So straightforward private financing isn’t always easy to come by. Renewable-energy companies could claim tax credits on the money they spend on projects, but of course, until they actually begin selling electricity they have little to zero profits, and therefore no tax bill to worry about in the first place. They need that money up front. Before the recession, there was a vibrant market in banks matching up renewable developers with companies that needed to offset the tax bill on their profits — but after the recession there were, to say the least, significantly fewer profits and little need by anyone, especially in the financial sector, for tax credits.

If the government hadn’t stepped in, the renewable industry might have been one of many victims of the 2007-08 financial crisis and recession. Federal stimulus spending not only saved the solar industry and its partners, it actually helped them thrive. Those billions in funds and loan guarantees were especially timely because European nations had begun winding down their expensive feed-in tariffs — long-term government-set contracts for renewable energy at favorable prices — that had helped build the global renewable-energy industry. (Even now, Germany and Italy account for two-thirds of the worldwide solar market, thanks chiefly to years of government support.) As a result of stimulus spending and a bit of help from Europe’s global investments, “the U.S. has 30 gigawatts of utility-scale solar in the construction and permitting pipeline,” says Harris. (See photos of a solar-powered airplane.)

The problem is, should those tax credits expire — as they’re currently set to do by 2016 — and little additional government funding come through, solar companies could find themselves back where they were at the start of the recession. They can hope that private financing will begin to flow, but there’s little evidence yet that banks are eager to lend out money for big renewable projects — especially with the national energy policy so uncertain. Big solar projects — many of which are done on federally managed land — are also held back by permitting headaches. The Sierra Club and other environmental groups have sued major solar-thermal projects in the deserts of the West on the grounds that construction may threaten endangered species. “Large-scale projects can take three to five years to get all the permits,” says Kevin Smith, the CEO of SolarReserve, a California-based solar-thermal company. “That’s significant.”

As fast as solar installation has grown in recent years, we still only get about 0.1% of the world’s electricity directly from the sun. If solar energy is going to become something more than a rounding error, green groups may need to do everything they can to accelerate big-solar projects. And if private capital isn’t yet ready to step up to the plate, the government needs to extend the loan guarantees and other funding that have proven so effective over the past couple of years. Otherwise we’ll risk experiencing a rerun of the 1980s, when the U.S. was the undisputed world leader in solar and other renewable technology — only to surrender that supremacy when government support collapsed. “I’m optimistic, but I work in solar — I have to be optimistic,” says Harris. I wish I could be so optimistic, but unless there’s change of heart in Washington, the future may dim fast for American solar.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2080176,00.html#ixzz1ZMv8BPpA

via Will Lack of Funding Dim the Solar Industry? – TIME.

The U.S. Navy's Going Green. Why That's a Good Thing – TIME

Blue Water, Green Fleet: The Navy Gets Eco-Friendly

By Bryan Walsh Tuesday, July 19, 2011

SHIGEKI MIYAJIMA / AFP / Getty ImagesPrint

In 1907, then President Theodore Roosevelt dispatched a U.S. Navy fleet of 16 battleships for a 16-month trip around the world. Though the hulls of the ships were painted white, the Navy’s peacetime color scheme — which led observers to nickname the vessels the Great White Fleet — the voyage wasn’t a holiday cruise. In the wake of the Spanish-American and Russo-Japanese wars, Roosevelt wanted the world to know that the U.S. was emerging as a major military power, one capable of projecting naval strength to every stretch of the oceans. Naval power would help define the geopolitics in the 20th century, and with the Great White Fleet, the U.S. raised the table stakes for every other nation.

It’s the 21st century now, and the defining geopolitical issue today may well be energy and everything that surrounds it, from climate change to imported oil. While American politicians seem unable to craft a meaningful energy policy — witness the breathtakingly stupid decision last week by House Republicans and a few Democrats to vote against energy-efficiency standards for lightbulbs �

via The U.S. Navy’s Going Green. Why That’s a Good Thing – TIME.

Droughts Getting Worse in Southern U.S. and Somalia – TIME

Going Green

Drought Cripples the South: Why the ‘Creeping Disaster’ Could Get a Whole Lot Worse

By Bryan Walsh Tuesday, Aug. 09, 2011

A weed grows out of the dr,y cracked bed of O.C. Fisher Lake on July 25, 2011, in San Angelo, Texas. The 5,440-acre (2,200 hectares) lake, which was established to provide flood control and serve as a secondary drinking-water source for San Angelo and surrounding communities, is now dry following an extended drought in the region

Scott Olson / Getty ImagesPrint

Email

Reprints

shareLinkedIn

StumbleUpon

Reddit

Digg

Del.i.cious

Hurricanes announce themselves on forecasters’ radar screens before slamming into an unlucky coast — all on live television. Tornadoes strike with little warning, but no one can doubt what’s going on the moment a black funnel cloud touches down. If we’re lucky, a tsunami offers a brief tip-off — the unnatural sight of the ocean retreating from the beach — before it cuts a swath of destruction and death.

But a drought is different. It begins with a few dry weeks strung end to end, cloudless skies and hot weather. Lawns brown as if toasted, and river and lake levels drop like puddles evaporating after the rain. Farmers worry over wilting crops as soil turns to useless dust. But for most of us, life goes on normally, the dry days in the background — until the moment we wake up and realize we’re living through a natural catastrophe. Weather experts like to call drought the “creeping disaster.” Though it destroys no property and yields no direct death toll, drought can cost billions of dollars, its effects lasting for months and even years. The writer Alex Prud’homme — author of a great new book on water called The Ripple Effect — compares drought to a “python, which slowly and inexorably squeezes its prey to death.”

(See “El Niño, La Niña, Climate Change and the Horrific Drought in Somalia.”)

This summer, the python has gripped much of the South, from the burned fringes of Arizona — singed by record-breaking wildfires — to usually swampy Georgia. Ground zero is Texas, which is suffering through the worst one-year drought on record, with the state receiving just 6 in. (15 cm) of rain since January. At the end of July, a record 12% of the continental U.S. was in a state of “exceptional drought” — the most severe ranking given by the National Drought Mitigation Center. More than 2 million acres (800,000 hectares) of farmland in Texas have been abandoned, streets are cracking as trees desperately draw the remaining moisture from the ground, and ranchers whose pasturelands have gone dry are selling off cattle by the thousands. “This historic drought has depleted water resources, leaving our state’s%

via Droughts Getting Worse in Southern U.S. and Somalia – TIME.